requestId:684c3e2c3e5672.84251508.
Be good for “mortals” [①]
——A revision of Confucian ethics’ philosophy on a trend
Author: Yang Zebo (Yu Dan Daxue)
Source: Author Authorized by the author Confucian network Published
� href=”https://twlovelog.com/Diana/”>Short-term maintenance In Heidegger, this concept has a difficult negative color, and this trend has been strengthened in subsequent developments and has had a serious impact on society. Confucianism’s thoughts on ethics are different from its differences. Confucian ethics uses ethics to explain Confucius’ benevolence and Mencius’ conscience, which determines that Confucius’ benevolence and Mencius’ conscience are essentially the model of “mortals”. Although the life of seeking good cannot be satisfied with this, this step still has its main value, not as unsuccessful as people imagine. The first thing to consider when it comes to virtue and goodness is not to solve the problem from the “mortality” state, but to be a good “mortality”.
[Keyword]: Activities Morality Motivation Learning Growth Direction Ethical Mood
[Chinese Graphic Category]
In tomorrow’s ethics world, “mortals” is a concept that everyone can know. Regardless of what meaning Heidegger himself applies this concept, it is difficult for him to dispel negative colors, and people often apply this concept on this concept. Influenced by this, it has long become the point of view of the current practice of “mortality” and the pursuit of true existence. In recent years, I have made new thoughts on this problem in the process of constructing Confucian ethics, came up with a conclusion that was completely opposite to that, and put forward the destiny of “being a good ‘mortal’”, hoping to modify the viewpoint of this style in this way. This article will give a preliminary review of this problem.
1. The preservation of “mortality” and the metaphysical meaning
The concept of “mortality” was proposed by Heidegger in the first and fourth chapter of “Astinct existence and its own existence. ‘mortal’”. This chapter of rational twists and turns is often regarded as the most difficult department in the whole book to understand and argue.
The main work of “Existence and Time” is this. To be clear about this question, you must first answer the question “Who is this?” Female College Students’ Care Club. This is of course me in general, but Heidegger doesn’t think so, and clearly states that “Cultivation software This is also when talking about itselfPreparing price ptt may always say: I am this being; but it is “not” the being that being.” (Heidegger: “Existence and Time”, page 134) We often habitually believe that I am the being who is this being, but Heidegger told us that this being is not me. “The ‘originality’ of this place is based on its preservation. If ‘I’ is sure to be one of the essential specifications of this place, this provision must be explained from the preservation theory. Only when a certain certain method of existence of this place is revealed in the phenomenon can one answer this question ” (Heidegger: “Existence and Time”, page 135) The main feature of this place is that it must be preserved. As long as the present is understood, the method of preservation of this place is clear, the question “Who is this place?” will be answered.
Discussing “who is this” from the meaning of preservation, the first thing that touches on is how this is dealing with the world. In the preservation and living world, we must contact the instruments in the world. But this is still just a preliminary stage. The more important thing about the preservation here is that people who cannot leave the surrounding area must meet the surrounding area. These people around are “others”. Others refer to people who are not much different from this place, and this place is preserved in the environment of people who are not much different from these places. This phenomenon Heidegger is called “in the middle”. “Inside” means cooperating with them. The peaceful existence in other people’s living world is to cooperate with this place. The world here is a cooperating world, and this place must be preserved in this cooperating world. This must lead to common existence in logic. “This is essentially shared—this phenomenon has a meaning to preserve the existence theory. This issue does not want to break from the level of existence: I actually do not exist independently, but others like me are there.” (Heidegger: “Existence and Time”, page 140)Because this is not separated from the common existence, the most direct impact of the common existence on this is to make this is to make this person confused and disappear in the common existence. “This is the same as the cooperation of others, starting from the beginning with the cooperation world that is controlled by the surrounding world. This is the disappearance of the world that is controlled by the world, that is, the disappearance of the shared existence of them at the same time is not itself.” (Heidegger: “Existence and Time”, page 146)
The concept of “mortality” comes from this. Since the common existence is the essence of this, this existence must be affected by it. Without knowing it, others accept the rule of this existence. This other person is not this person, not that person, nor the total of all people, but a neutral thing, this is the “mortal”. In Heidegger, mortals have characteristics such as common presence, equality, flatness, public opinion, removal of existence and flattery. These characteristics constitute the “constant state” of this place, causing this place to fall to oneself. “When we exist as an being in the above methods, our own self and other people’s self have not yet discovered that it has fallen to itself or perhaps it has fallen to itself. Mortals exist in non-self-reliance and non-original states.” (Heidegger: “Existence and Time”, page 149) Mortals thus developed their own self to this. The mortals enjoy themselves, the mortals enjoy themselves, the mortals judge, the mortals judge, the mortals are angry, the mortals are angry. Heideggert emphasized that the most essential characteristic of mortals is uniform state. This uniform state determines people’s recognition and disagreement, and is profitable and unsuccessful. Any effort that wants to overestimate this state is ruthlessly suppressed, any creative force is smoothed out, and any result of any struggle will be lost. Everything is not drowned in this equality state, it has no more itself, no more meaning, and becomes a molecule of equality state. In this way, Heidegger found the conclusion of “who is this person”: “This mortal is the question of who is this person in daily life.” (Heidegger: “Existence and Time”, page 149)
There is a disagreement in Heidegger’s argument about “mortality”. Most people believe that Heidegger’s speech is intended to confess that modern people are swallowed up and lose themselves. [②] However, some scholars such as Hubert Drefus have disagreements and believe that the preservation theory and ethics should be processed when the preservation theory should be processed. Heidegger’s analysis of “mortals” only has preservation theory meaning, not the ethics meaning. 力官网Affected by this, some people in China have also advocated that Heidegger’s statement about “mortals” only discusses the problem of “who is this” and has no direct relationship with the existence theory. (Zhang Rulun: “Existence and Time”, page 399) In recent years, some scholars have carefully analyzed Heidegger’s text without setting any specific position and setting only the lack of ethics learning or lacking elements, and discussed this question from the beginning 彩彩 topic, and noticed that “Heidegger’s confusing part about the analysis of mortals is not his emphasis on the commonality of the everyday world, but on the It has a clear negative view of this commonality” (Sun Xiaoling: “Existence and Ethics – Basic Discussion Assessment of Heidegger’s Realistic Philosophical Dimension” [③], page 36), and we have found the meaningful internal connection between the preservation of the “mortal” thinking and the ethics. According to this understanding, the arrangement of the public world for this present will not prevent it from being const
發佈留言